<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sovtends</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Современные тенденции в строительстве, градостроительстве и планировке территорий</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2949-1835</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Don State Technical University</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23947/2949-1835-2023-2-2-72-80</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sovtends-47</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Основы обеспечения экологической безопасности строительных материалов на всех этапах их жизненного цикла</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Fundamentals of Ensuring the Environmental Safety of Building Materials at all Stages of their Life Cycle</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6575-5568</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лысова</surname><given-names>Е. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Lysova</surname><given-names>E. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Лысова Екатерина Петровна, доцент кафедры «Инженерная защита окружающей среды», кандидат технических наук</p><p>344003, г. Ростов-на-Дону, пл. Гагарина, 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ekaterina P Lysova, associate professor of the Environmental Engineering Department, Cand. Sc. (Engineering)</p><p>1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">katerina.lysova0803@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-5801</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Котлярова</surname><given-names>Е. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kotlyarova</surname><given-names>E. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Котлярова Екатерина Владимировна, доцент кафедры «Инженерная защита окружающей среды», кандидат экономических наук</p><p>344003, г. Ростов-на-Дону, пл. Гагарина, 1</p><p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ekaterina V Kotlyarova, associate professor of the Environmental Engineering Department, Cand. Sc. (Economics)</p><p>1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">ekkot.arch@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Донской государственный технический университет<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Don State Technical University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>07</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>72</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Лысова Е.П., Котлярова Е.В., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Лысова Е.П., Котлярова Е.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Lysova E.P., Kotlyarova E.V.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.stsg-donstu.ru/jour/article/view/47">https://www.stsg-donstu.ru/jour/article/view/47</self-uri><abstract><p>Введение. Оценка экологической безопасности для осуществления выбора оптимальной технологии производства строительных материалов является весьма актуальной. В качестве научной проблемы выделена необходимость экологической оценки (оценки экологической безопасности) жизненного цикла любого строительного материала на всех его этапах — от приобретения сырья или изготовления продукции из природных ресурсов до утилизации изделий, при этом принципиальная схема жизненного цикла строительного материала дополнена авторами этапом транспортировки (сырья, готового изделия). В качестве объекта исследования выступал условный строительный материал, а целью исследования явилась экологическая оценка нагрузок каждого этапа жизненного цикла условного строительного материала на компоненты окружающей среды. Данная работа должна способствовать внедрению технологии производства экологически более безопасных строительных материалов.Материалы и методы. Авторами была рассмотрена взаимосвязь между свойствами материалов и качеством среды с использованием методов сопоставительного и системного анализов, метода графов и квалиметрического метода.Результаты исследования. В результате проведенных исследований проанализированы потенциальные воздействия условного строительного материала на окружающую среду на всех этапах жизненного цикла — от приобретения сырья, производства и использования продукции до переработки по окончании ее срока службы, рециклинга и заключительной утилизации (цикл «от колыбели до могилы»). Авторами предложено учитывать этапы транспортировки сырья и готовой продукции в жизненном цикле строительных материалов для выполнения более точной оценки их воздействия на окружающую среду. Таким путем можно учесть весь жизненный цикл и включить данные в решение экологических задач, в том числе сократить величину выбросов, сбросов и отходов, что будет способствовать сбережению ресурсов.Обсуждение и заключения. Экологическая оценка жизненного цикла строительного материала прежде всего должна учитывать вклад его негативного воздействия в обострение глобальных экологических проблем, в том числе глобальное потепление, разрушение озона в стратосферном слое атмосферы, образование озона в тропосферном слое, окисление водных ресурсов и почв, эвтрофикация водоемов, истощение невозобновляемых источников энергии (нефть, газ, уголь). Проведенный авторами анализ позволяет сделать вывод о том, что существенные различия в степени негативного воздействия на компоненты окружающей среды условных строительных материалов наблюдаются на этапе их изготовления. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Introduction. Environmental safety assessment for selecting the optimal technology of building materials manufacture is quite relevant. The necessity of environmental assessment (environmental safety assessment) of each life cycle stage of any building material (from the purchase of raw materials or the manufacture of products out of natural resources to the disposal of products) has been distinguished as a scientific problem for the present research, alongside, the authors have supplemented the schematic diagram of a building material life cycle with the transportation stage (of raw materials, finished products). The object of the study is a notional building material, and the purpose of the study is assessment of the stress imposed on the environment components by each life cycle stage of a notional building material. This work should foster implementation of more environmentally safe technology of building materials manufacture.Materials and Methods. The authors examined the interrelation between the properties of materials and the quality of the environment using the methods of comparative and system analysis, the graph method and the qualimetric method. Results. As a result of the conducted research, the potential impacts of a notional building material on the environment at all life cycle stages have been analysed — from purchase of raw materials, manufacture and use of products till their processing at the end of service life, recycling and final disposal (the cycle “from cradle to grave”). The authors proposed to take into account the stages of transportation of raw materials and finished products within the building materials life cycle to make a more accurate assessment of their impact on the environment. This approach allows taking into account the entire life cycle and applying the data to solving the environmental problems, such as reducing the amount of emissions, discharges and wastes, thus, fostering saving the resources.Discussion and Conclusions. The environmental assessment of a building material life cycle, should, first of all, take into account the share of its negative impact in the aggravation of the global environmental problems, including global warming, ozone destruction in the stratospheric layer of the atmosphere, formation of ozone in the tropospheric layer, oxidation of water resources and soils, eutrophication of water bodies, depletion of non-renewable energy sources (oil, gas, coal). The carried out analysis allows the authors to conclude that significant differences in the degree of negative impact of the notional building materials on the environment components are observed at the stage of their manufacture.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экологическая безопасность</kwd><kwd>жизненный цикл</kwd><kwd>градостроительная экология</kwd><kwd>современные строительные материалы</kwd><kwd>методы оценки жизненного цикла</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>environmental safety</kwd><kwd>life cycle</kwd><kwd>urban ecology</kwd><kwd>modern building materials</kwd><kwd>life cycle assessment methods</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bespalov V., Kotlyarova E. Assessment of the level of impact and degree of environmental safety of industrial facilities in the urban environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;177:012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/177/1/012036</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bespalov V, Kotlyarova E. Assessment of the level of impact and degree of environmental safety of industrial facilities in the urban environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;177:012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/177/1/012036</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bespalov V., Kotlyarova E. Methodological bases for assessing the level of environmental safety of dynamically developing urbanized territories. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;1001:012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1001/1/012101</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bespalov V, Kotlyarova E. Methodological bases for assessing the level of environmental safety of dynamically developing urbanized territories. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;1001:012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1001/1/012101</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Halding P.S. Reduction of the Carbon Footprint of Precast Columns by Combining Normal and Light Aggregate Concrete. Buildings. 2022;12(2):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020215</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Halding PS. Reduction of the Carbon Footprint of Precast Columns by Combining Normal and Light Aggregate Concrete. Buildings. 2022;12(2):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020215</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Colangelo F., Forcina A., Farina I. et al. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Kinds of Concrete Containing Waste for Sustainable Construction. Buildings. 2018;8(5):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8050070</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Colangelo F, Forcina A, Farina I. et al. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Kinds of Concrete Containing Waste for Sustainable Construction. Buildings. 2018;8(5):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8050070</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bovea M.D., Powell J.C. Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes. Waste Management. 2016;50:151–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.036</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bovea MD, Powell JC. Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes. Waste Management. 2016;50:151–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.036</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ensign P.C. Business Models and Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability. 2022;14:2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052558</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ensign PC. Business Models and Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability. 2022;14:2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052558</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Daugaard D., Ding A. Global Drivers for ESG Performance: The Body of Knowledge. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042322</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Daugaard D, Ding A. Global Drivers for ESG Performance: The Body of Knowledge. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042322</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Verstina N., Solopova N., Taskaeva N. et al. New Approach to Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Industrial Facilities. Buildings. 2022;12(2):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020191</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Verstina N, Solopova N, Taskaeva N. et al. New Approach to Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Industrial Facilities. Buildings. 2022;12(2):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020191</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reyes-Quijije M., Rocha-Tamayo A., García-Troncoso N. et al. Preparation, Characterization, and Life Cycle Assessment of Aerated Concrete Blocks: A Case Study in Guayaquil City, Ecuador. Applied Science. 2022;12(4):1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041913</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reyes-Quijije M, Rocha-Tamayo A, García-Troncoso N. et al. Preparation, Characterization, and Life Cycle Assessment of Aerated Concrete Blocks: A Case Study in Guayaquil City, Ecuador. Applied Science. 2022;12(4):1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041913</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pushkar S., Yezioro A. Life Cycle Assessment Meeting Energy Standard Performance: An Office Building Case Study. Buildings. 2022;12(2):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020157</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pushkar S, Yezioro A. Life Cycle Assessment Meeting Energy Standard Performance: An Office Building Case Study. Buildings. 2022;12(2):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020157</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ferretti D., Michelini E. The Effect of Density on the Delicate Balance between Structural Requirements and Environmental Issues for AAC Blocks: An Experimental Investigation. Sustainability. 2021;13(23):13186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313186</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ferretti D, Michelini E. The Effect of Density on the Delicate Balance between Structural Requirements and Environmental Issues for AAC Blocks: An Experimental Investigation. Sustainability. 2021;13(23):13186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313186</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yang Q., Kong L., Tong H. et al. Evaluation Model of Environmental Impacts of Insulation Building Envelopes. Sustainability. 2020;12(6):2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062258</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yang Q, Kong L, Tong H. et al. Evaluation Model of Environmental Impacts of Insulation Building Envelopes. Sustainability. 2020;12(6):2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062258</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen P.-K., Lujan-Blanco I., Fortuny-Santos J. et al. Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability: The Effects of Employee Involvement, Stakeholder Pressure and ISO 14001. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187258</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen P-K, Lujan-Blanco I, Fortuny-Santos J. et al. Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability: The Effects of Employee Involvement, Stakeholder Pressure and ISO 14001. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187258</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ociepa-Kubicka A., Deska I., Ociepa E. Organizations towards the Evaluation of Environmental Management Tools ISO 14001 and EMAS. Energies. 2021;14(16):4870. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164870</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ociepa-Kubicka A, Deska I, Ociepa E. Organizations towards the Evaluation of Environmental Management Tools ISO 14001 and EMAS. Energies. 2021;14(16):4870. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164870</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kisku N., Joshi H., Ansari M. et al. A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;131:721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kisku N, Joshi H, Ansari M. et al. A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;131:721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Князева В.П. Экологические аспекты выбора материалов в архитектурном проектировании. Москва: Архитектура-С; 2006. 296 с. URL: http://books.totalarch.com/ecological_aspects_of_the_choice_of_materials_in_architectural_</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knyazeva VP. Ekologicheskie aspekty vybora materialov v arhitekturnom proektirovanii. Moscow: ArhitekturaS Publ.; 2006. 296 p. Available at: http://books.totalarch.com/ecological_aspects_of_the_choice_of_materials_in_architectural</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
