Evaluation of the Reliability of Design Solutions during the Reconstruction of a Cultural Heritage Site Taking into Account Seismic Impacts
https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-2-21-37
EDN: YPWWOY
Abstract
Introduction. In order to ensure seismic resistance and reduce seismic loads, during the reconstruction of the cultural heritage site, a spatial calculation of the supporting structures of the cinema and variety hall was performed. This article analyzes the structural system, the calculation and dynamic model taking into account the main and special combinations of loads.
Materials and Methods. The calculations were carried out using the analytical method and the finite element method in the STARK ES software package.
Results. For the purpose of reconstructing the building of the cultural heritage site, the results of dynamic calculation were obtained for the main and special combinations of loads and corresponding combinations of internal forces in the calculated structures of the cinema and variety hall. In this case, only 25 loadings were used.
Discussion and Conclusion. The results of the calculation of the cinema building showed that the required load-bearing capacity of the building of a cultural heritage site is ensured in the considered design situation.
About the Authors
Kh. N. Mazhiev
Millionshchikov Grozny State Oil Technical University, Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Khasan N. Mazhiev, Dr.Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Head of the Department of Building Structures
100 Kh.A. Isaev pr-t, Grozny, Chechen Republic, 364051, Russian Federation
K. Kh. Mazhiev
Millionshchikov Grozny State Oil Technical University, Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic; Kh. Ibragimov Complex Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kazbek K. Mazhiev, Cand.Sci. (Eng.), Scientific Director of the Scientific and Technical Center "Safety of Buildings and Structures under Natural and Man-Made Impacts", Associate Professor of the Building Structures Department
100 Kh.A. Isaev pr-t, Grozny, Chechen Republic, 364051, Russian Federation;
Senior Researcher
21a V. Aliyev str. Grozny, Chechen Republic, 364051, Russian Federation
Yu. V. Panasenko
Central Research Institute of Building Structures named after V.A. Kucherenko JSC "Research Center "Construction"
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yuri V. Panasenko, Head of the expert calculations group of the Laboratory of Automation of Research and Design of Structures
6, 2-ya Institutskaya St., Moscow, 109428, Russian Federation
A. Kh. Mazhieva
Millionshchikov Grozny State Oil Technical University, Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Amina K. Mazhieva, Cand.Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor of the Department of Building Structures
100 Kh.A. Isaev pr-t, Grozny, Chechen Republic, 364051, Russian Federation
A. Kh. Mazhiev
Millionshchikov Grozny State Oil Technical University, Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic; Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Aslan K. Mazhiev, Researcher, Department of Physical, Mathematical and Technical Sciences
19a Vahi Aliyev str., Grozny, Chechen Republic, 364043, Russian Federation;
Senior Lecturer, Department of Building Structures
100 Kh.A. Isaev pr-t, Grozny, Chechen Republic, 364051, Russian Federation
A. Kh. Mazhiev
Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Adam K. Mazhiev, Researcher, Department of Physical, Mathematical and Technical Sciences
19a Vahi Aliyev str., Grozny, Chechen Republic, 364043, Russian Federation
References
1. Themelis S. Pushover Analysis for Seismic Assessment and Design of Structures. Heriot-Watt University: School of the Built Environment; 2008. 287 p. URL: https://www.ros.hw.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10399/2170/ThemelisS_1008_sbe.pdf?sequence=1 (дата обращения 24.02.2025).
2. Wilson EL Static & Dynamic Analysis of Structures: a Physical Approach with Em-Phasis on Earthquake Engineering. Computers and Structures; 2004. 394 p.
3. Mailyan LR, Zubritsky MA, Ushakov OYu, Sabitov LS. Calculation of High-Rise Structures Under Seismic Impact of the Control Earthquake Level by the Nonlinear Static Method on the Example of the Adyghe Wind Farm. Construction Materials and Products. 2020;3(1):14–20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34031/2618-7183-2020-3-1-14-20
4. Mailyan DR, Muradyan VA. Method of Calculating Eccentrically Compressed Concrete Columns. Engineering Bulletin of the Don. 2012;4(2):182. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4p2y2012/1333 (accessed: 24.02.2025)
5. Muselemov HM, Mailyan DR, Muselemov DU. Stress-Strain State of a Three-Layer Tubular Structure under the Influence of a Uniformly Distributed Pulse Load. Engineering Bulletin of the Don. 2023; 11(107):386–400. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n11y2023/8786 (accessed: 24.02.2025)
6. Pshenichkina VA, Drozdov VV, Chauskin AY Seismic Reliability of High-Rise Buildings. Volgograd: Publishing House of Volgograd State Technical University; 2022. 180 p. (In Russ.)
7. Mailyan LR, Stelmakh SA, Shcherban EM. Calculation and Design of Building Structures Taking into Account the Variotropy of Structure, Sections and Differentiation of Structural Characteristics of Materials. Scientific Journal of Construction and Architecture. 2021;2(62):27–48. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36622/VSTU.2021.62.2.002
8. Mailyan LR, Zubritsky MA, Ushakov OYu, Sabitov LS, Bambulevich MD. Seismic Resistance Estimation of Existing Turbogenerator Foundation Structures under Ductility Level Earthquake Impact by Nonlinear Static Method. Academic Bulletin of UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2020;4(47):79–83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25628/UNIIP.2020.47.4.013
9. Mailyan LR, Yazyev SB., Sabitov LS, Konoplev YuG., Radaykin OV. Stress-Strain State of the System "Combined Tower - Reinforced Concrete Foundation - Foundation Soil" of High-Rise Buildings. Construction Materials and Products. 2019;2(6):29–37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34031/2618-7183-2019-2-6-29-37
10. Abakanov T, Kusainov AA, Teplykh AV, Bondarev DE Seismology and Seismic Resistance of Structures. Moscow: SKAD SOFT Publishing House, ASV Publishing House; 2024. 624 p. (In Russ.) URL: https://iasv.ru/sejsmologiya-isejsmostojkost-sooruzhenij.html (accessed: 24.02.2025).
11. Mazhiev KhN, Bataev DK-S, Gaziev MA, Mazhiev KKh, Mazhieva AKh Materials and Structures for the Construction and Restoration of Buildings and Structures in Seismic Areas. Grozny: Kh. Ibragimov Complex Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2014. 652 p. (In Russ.)
12. Mazhiev KhN, Mazhiev KKh, Panasenko YuV, Mazhieva AKh, Mazhiev AKh, Mazhiev AKh Adhering to Regulatory Requirements in Calculation of Earthquake Resistance of the Structures of Life-Saving Buildings. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2024;3(4):17–29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2024-3-4-17-29
13. Mazhiev KhN, Mazhiev KKh, Mazhieva AKh, Semenov SYu, Mazhiev AKh, Mazhiev AKh Structural System and Computational Dynamic Model of a Life-Saving Multi-Storey Building with a Kinematic Seismic Isolation System. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2024;3(3):71–82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2024-3-3-71-82
14. Scientific and Technical Expertise on the Topic: "Scientific and Technical Support for the Design of a Cultural Heritage Site of Regional Significance "Aurora Cinema", 1967, located at Krasnodar, Krasnaya St., 169, lit. A. Reconstruction and Adaptation for Modern Use." Volume 1. Cinema and Variety Hall (Block A1). Moscow: Central Research Institute of Building Structures named after VA Kucherenko, JSC "Research Center "Construction"; 2024. 65 p. (In Russ.)
15. Recommendations for Accounting for the Wave Nature of Seismic Impact and Protection against Emergencies. Moscow, V.A. Kucherenko Central Research Institute of Structures, 2024. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Mazhiev Kh.N., Mazhiev K.Kh., Panasenko Yu.V., Mazhieva A.Kh., Mazhiev A.Kh., Mazhiev A.Kh. Evaluation of the Reliability of Design Solutions during the Reconstruction of a Cultural Heritage Site Taking into Account Seismic Impacts. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2025;4(2):21-37. https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-2-21-37. EDN: YPWWOY
Views:
75
Email this article 