Preview

Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning

Advanced search

Implementation of Machine Learning Models in the Construction Site Organization Process

https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-2-106-116

EDN: DEMQTY

Abstract

Introduction. Strategic planning is important for effectiveness of investment and construction projects. Complexity of solving problems increases with growth of variables in calculations and constraints. For effective planning of construction sites, many factors need to be taken into account, such as spatial constraints and distances between objects. To solve such problems, it is possible to use a mathematical machine learning model – a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the placement of objects on a construction site. The aim of this study is to improve the accuracy and flexibility of solutions in the organization of the construction site, reduce complexity of calculations and minimize the amount of data.
Materials and Methods. The realization of this goal is possible by introducing the Systematic layout planning (SLP) method into the planning process to optimize space on construction sites. To confirm the effectiveness of optimizing the location of objects, the SLP method was applied in the organization of planning the construction site of an administrative building. The planning took into account the stages of work, the required economic facilities, data on safety and environmental safety of the construction site. The use of the Dynamo plugin for analysis made it possible to adjust the location of objects taking into account the utilization factor of the territory.
Research Results. As a result of the modeling of the construction site plan, it was found that using the SLP method, the process is adapted, taking into account the location of objects according to the established values of the relationship matrix using automation and color coding to simplify analysis. Flexibility in making informed decisions is important for designers, given the safety and intensity of the workflow. The SLP method reduces distances through optimization of logistics, optimizes the location of objects on the construction site, taking into account restrictions. This hybrid approach increases the efficiency of implementing machine learning models in the design process of building master plans of facilities. The integration of the genetic algorithm and BIM technologies into the construction site organization process helps to optimize solutions based on optimal distances, improves the visualization of decisions and problem correction.
Discussion and Conclusions. The results of the study contribute to decision-making efficiently and quickly, minimizing the time required for analysis compared to some other approaches. The result of the research is the creation of a system that is not only flexible and adaptable, but also overcomes the limitations typical of previous methods. The use of machine learning technologies to predict optimal design decisions and automate the establishment of key relationships can significantly reduce the need for manual data entry, thereby simplifying and speeding up development processes. Adding new examples of diverse plans and spatial constraints will strengthen the foundations of the concept and enrich its application in a variety of investment and construction projects.

About the Author

S. E. Manzhilevskaya
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation

Svetlana E. Manzhilevskaya, Cand.Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor of the Construction Management Department

1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003, RF



References

1. Xu M, Mei Z, Luo S, Tan Y Optimization Algorithms for Construction Site Layout Planning: A Systematic Literature Review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2020;27:1913–1938. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2019-0457

2. Al Hawarneh A, Bendak S, Ghanim F Dynamic Facilities Planning Model for Large Scale Construction Projects. Automation in Construction. 2019;98:72–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.11.021

3. Succar B Building Information Modelling Framework: A Research and Delivery Foundation for Industry Stakeholders. Automation in Construction. 2009;18(3):357–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.003

4. Kaveh A, Vazirnia Y Construction Site Layout Planning Problem Using Metaheuristic Algorithms: A Comparative Study. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering. 2019;43:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-018-0148-6

5. Jaafar K, Elbarkouky R, Kennedy J Construction Site Layout Optimization Model Considering Cost and Safety in a Dynamic Environment. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2021;22:297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00314-3

6. Prayogo D, Cheng M-Y, Wu Y-W, Redi AANP, Yu VF, Persada SF at al. A Novel Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm for Optimization of Construction Management Site Layout Planning. Algorithms. 2020;13:117. https://doi.org/10.3390/a13050117

7. Yang B, Fang T, Luo X, Liu B, Dong M A BIM-Based Approach to Automated Prefabricated Building Construction Site Layout Planning. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2021;26:1535–1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-021-0746-x

8. Papadaki IN, Chassiakos AP Multi-Objective Construction Site Layout Planning Using Genetic Algorithms. Procedia Engineering. 2016;164:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.587

9. Salah M, Elbeltagi E, Elsheikh A Optimization of Construction Site Layout Using BIM Generative Design. International Journal of Construction Management. 2024;24:314–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2222997

10. Chemim L, Sotsek N, Kleina M Layout Optimization Methods and Tools: A Systematic Literature Review. Gestão da Produção, Operações e Sistemas. 2021;16(4):59–81. https://doi.org/10.15675/gepros.v16i4.2806

11. Said H, El-Rayes K Optimizing Material Procurement and Storage on Construction Sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2011;137:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000307

12. Maghfiroh MFN, Redi AANP, Ong J, Fikri MR Cuckoo Search Algorithm for Construction Site Layout Planning. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence. 2023;12:851. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v12.i2.pp851-860

13. Schwabe K, Teizer J, König M Applying Rule-Based Model-Checking to Construction Site Layout Planning Tasks. Automation in Construction. 2019;97:205–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.012

14. Le PL, Dao TM, Chaabane A BIM-Based Framework for Temporary Facility Layout Planning in Construction Site: A Hybrid Approach. Construction Innovation. 2019;19:424–464. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-06-2018-0052

15. Petroutsatou K, Apostolidis N, Zarkada A, Ntokou A Dynamic Planning of Construction Site for Linear Projects. Infrastructures. 2021;6:21. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6020021

16. Dienstknecht M A Branch and Bound Approach for the Tower Crane Selection and Positioning Problem with Respect to Mutual Interference. 4OR. 2022;21:105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10288-022-00503-7

17. Karmakar A, Singh AR, Kumar Delhi VS Automated Route Planning for Construction Site Utilizing Building Information Modeling. Journal of Information Technology in Construction. 2022;27:827–844. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2022.040

18. Lacerda DP, Dresch A, Proença A, Antunes Júnior JAV Design Science Research: Método de Pesquisa para a Engenharia de Produção. Gestão & Produção. 2013;20(4):741–761. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2013005000014


Review

For citations:


Manzhilevskaya S.E. Implementation of Machine Learning Models in the Construction Site Organization Process. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2025;4(2):106-116. https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-2-106-116. EDN: DEMQTY

Views: 7


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-1835 (Online)