Determination and Analysis of Flexure ∆𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑒 and Shear ∆𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 Displacements Displacements of Reinforced Concrete Walls of Civil Buildings
https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-3-7-17
EDN: ITESKN
Abstract
Introduction. To date, there have been extensive experimental data made available in both domestic and foreign scientific literature on the study of displacements and deformations of reinforced concrete walls under the combined action of horizontal load Q and vertical load N. However, there are not enough comprehensive works systematizing the obtained data to be used as an empirical basis for designing more accurate deformation models and engineering calculation methods for walls, allowing differentiated assessment of flexure ∆𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑒 and shear ∆𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 displacements. This article aims to look into this issue.
Materials and Methods. The object of the study is reinforced concrete walls of buildings and structures under the combined action of horizontal load Q and vertical load N. The subject of the study are the displacements and deformations of the walls. Materials include scientific articles on the topic by foreign authors. The methods being used are formal logic (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction), graphical methods for constructing deformation schemes, and analytical methods of nonlinear structural mechanics.
Research Results. For wall aspect ratios 1.5 < H/B < 2.0, flexure ∆𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑒 displacements dominate in the total displacement structure ∆, while horizontal sliding displacements ∆𝑠𝑙𝑖𝑑 amount to about 1% of ∆ and can be neglected. The share of flexure ∆𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑒 is approximately 98% of ∆ at the initial loading stages. As horizontal load Q increases, the contribution of ∆𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑒 gradually decreases: to 90% at the moment of crack formation, to 85% at the yielding of vertical reinforcement, and to 80% at the failure stage (when compressed concrete spalls).
For wall aspect ratios 1.0 < H/B < 1.5, shear displacement ∆shear has a significant influence on the total displacement ∆: its share at the initial loading stages is about 22%, while determining a protective concrete layer — 46%, and reaches 64% at failure. Using the graphs of relative displacements of walls with aspect ratios 1.5 < H/B < 2.0, it was found that at the failure stage, the shares of flexure and shear displacements are 88% and 12% of the total, respectively. Similar graphs obtained for walls with aspect ratios 1.0 < H/B < 1.5 confirmed that ∆𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 significantly affects the total displacement ∆. The share of ∆shear at initial loading is about 22%, while determining a protective concrete layer — 46%, and reaches 64% at failure.
Discussion and Conclusion. The "X-diagonals" method implemented in a planar calculation scheme allows for highly accurate separation of components caused by flexure and shear deformations from the total displacements. Thanks to this the scheme is a promising tool for further experimental and theoretical studies. We assume that the height of the wall segment where the diagonals are designed should be arbitrary — Hi making this method more universal.
In addition to the planar calculation scheme, a rod (beam) scheme can also be used. The rod calculation scheme of the wall, with known patterns of stiffness parameter changes in the rod end sections (at the locations of plastic hinge formation), is convenient for engineering calculations of frame buildings and structures based on the finite element method in diverse computational complexes.
About the Authors
O. V. RadaikinRussian Federation
Oleg V. Radaikin, D.Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Department of Energy Supply of Enterprises, Construction of Buildings and Structures, Kazan State Power University; Associate Professor of the Department of Structural and Design Engineering, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
51 Krasnoselskaya Str., Kazan, 420066
18/1 Kremlevskaya Str., Kazan, 420008
N. V. Khnycheva
Russian Federation
Nadezhda V. Khnycheva, PhD Student, Department of Energy Supply of Enterprises, Construction of Buildings and Structures
51 Krasnoselskaya Str., Kazan, 420066
References
1. Radaykin OV, Khnycheva NV Influence of Various Factors on the Strength, Rigidity and Crack Resistance of Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Walls of Civil Buildings: Classification of Factors, Influence of Geometric Parameters and Load Ratios. Engineering Journal of Don. 2024;11. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n11y2024/9634 (accessed: 08.06.2025).
2. Schuler H. Flexural and Shear Deformation of Basement-Clamped Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls. Materials. 2024;17(10):2267. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17102267
3. Schuler H, Meier F, Trost B. Influence of the tension shift effect on the force–displacement curve of reinforced concrete shear walls. Engineering Structures. 2023;274:115144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115144
4. Mohamed N, Farghaly AS, Benmokrane B, Neale KW. Flexure and Shear Deformation of GFRP-Reinforced Shear Walls. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2013;18(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000444
5. Massone LM, Orakcal K, Wallace JW. Shear-Flexure Interaction for Structural Walls. In book: SP-236, ACI Special Publication — Deformation Capacity and Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Members Under Cyclic Loading. 2006. P. 127–150. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284079633 (дата обращения 08.06.2025).
6. Mohamed N. Strength and Drift Capacity of Gfrp-Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls. Canada: University of Sherbrooke; 2013. 155 p. URL: https://www.academia.edu/79574653/Strength_and_Drift_Capacity_of_Gfrp_Reinforced_Concrete_Shear_Walls (дата обращения 08.06.2025).
7. Arafa A. Assessment of strength, stiffness and deformation capacity of concrete squat walls reinforced with GFRP Bar. Canada: Sohag University; 2017. 223 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16345.06245
8. Kolozvari KI. Analytical Modeling of Cyclic Shear — Flexure Interaction in Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls. Los Angeles: University of California; 2013. 334 p. URL: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6sm78634 (дата обращения 08.06.2025).
9. Mergos PE, Beyer K. Modelling shear-flexure interaction in equivalent frame models of slender RC walls. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2013; 23(15):1171–1189. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1114
10. Hiraishi H. Evaluation of shear and flexural deformations of flexural type shear walls. Bulletin of the New Zealand National society for Earthquake Engineering. 1984;17(2):135–144. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.17.2.135-144
11. Beyer K, Dazio A, Priestley MJN. Shear Deformations of Slender Reinforced Concrete Walls under Seismic Loading. ACI Structural Journal. 2011;108(2):167–177. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286384751 (accessed: 08.06.2025).
12. Mohamed N, Farghaly AS, Benmokrane B, Neale KW. Experimental investigation of concrete shear walls reinforced with glass-fiber-reinforced bars under lateral cyclic loading. Journal of Composites for Construction. 2014;18(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000393
Review
For citations:
Radaikin O.V., Khnycheva N.V. Determination and Analysis of Flexure ∆𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑟𝑒 and Shear ∆𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑟 Displacements Displacements of Reinforced Concrete Walls of Civil Buildings. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2025;4(3):7-17. https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-3-7-17. EDN: ITESKN