Adhesive Strength of Wood Glue Joints with a Reinforcement Made from Used Band Saw Blades
https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-4-61-68
EDN: UBYKLB
Abstract
Introduction. Due to the high volumes of lumber production in the Russian Federation, there is an issue of recycling used band saw blades (UBSB) with a service life of 20–500 hours. A way to tackle the problem at hand is to make use of UBSB as a reinforcement material for wood elements. This solution also contributes to a reduction in the cost of such structures by making a reinforcement material more affordable to purchase. This study focuses on investigating the adhesive strength of a UBSB-wood bond.
Materials and Methods. Studies of the adhesive strength of a “wood-reinforcement” adhesive joint have been a comparative analysis of the test results of samples with the inclusion of UBSB, as well as rods of a steel and composite reinforcement. Reinforcement elements were glued into pine wood blanks with an adhesive composition based on epoxy resin ED-20 (a hardener is polyethylene polyamine, a filler is quartz sand, a plasticizer is dibutyl phthalate). The tests were conducted by means of pulling out using the REM-100 machine at a speed of 5 mm/min. Statistical processing of the experimental results included the calculation of the average value of the destructive load for each group of the samples, as well as the variance, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation.
Research Results. The wooden samples with glued reinforcement bars showed a high strength of the wood–reinforcement joint which was close to the samples with a steel reinforcement with a difference of about 4% and was considerably beyond the strength of the samples with a composite reinforcement — up to 20%.
Discussion and Conclusion. The adhesive joint of wood with reinforcing elements made of reinforced concrete has a sufficiently high adhesive strength which was close to that of the samples with a steel reinforcement. Hence the use of UBSB as a material for reinforcing wooden elements and structures is an appropriate and efficient way of enhancing the performance of load-bearing structures made of wood. On top of that, such a solution would tackle the problem of the disposal of reinforced concrete, as well as to a degree reduce the cost of reinforced wooden structures (RWSs) "in action" due to the low cost of a reinforcing material.
Keywords
About the Authors
D. O. MyasnikovРоссия
Daniil O. Myasnikov, PhD student of the Department of Building Structures
87 Gorky Str., Vladimir, 600000
V. A. Repin
Россия
Vladimir A. Repin, Associate Professor of the Department of Building Structures
87 Gorky Str., Vladimir, 600000
S. I. Roshchina
Россия
Svetlana I. Roshchina, Dr.Sc. (Eng.), Professor, Department of Building Structures
87 Gorky Str., Vladimir, 600000
References
1. Roshchina SI Reinforcement – Efficient Means of Increasing Reliability and Durability of Wooden Structures. Bulletin of Higher Educational Institutions. Russian Forestry Journal. 2008;2:71–74. (In Russ.) URL: https://lesnoizhurnal.ru/issuesarchive/?ELEMENT_ID=694 (accessed: 22.10.2025)
2. Martinov VA, Myasnikov DO, Roshchina SI Investigation of the Strength and Deformability of Glued Wooden Beams with Lamellae Made of Thermally Damaged (Pinus Sylvestris L.) Wood Based on Experimental Planning. Forestry Engineering Journal. 2024;14(1):170–189. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2024.1/10
3. Gribanov AS, Rimshin VI, Roshchina SI Experimental Investigations of Composite Wooden Beams with Local Wood Modification. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019;687:033039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/687/3/033039
4. Kula K, Socha T Renovation and Strengthening of Wooden Beams with CFRP Bands Including the Rheological Effects. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports. 2016;22(3):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1515/ceer-2016-0038
5. Corradi М, Speranzini E, Borri А, Vignoli А In-Plane Shear Reinforcement of Wood Beam Floors with FRP. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2006;37(4–5):310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.11.003
6. Rescalvo FJ, Valverde-Palacios I, Suarez E, Gallego А Experimental Comparison of Different Carbon Fiber Composites in Reinforcement Layouts for Wooden Beams of Historical Buildings. Materials. 2017;10(10):1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10101113
7. Попова, М. В., Тужилова М.В., Репин В.А. Напряженное состояние балок с раскосной перфорацией. Международная конференция по физике материалов, строительным конструкциям и технологиям в строительстве, промышленной и производственной инженерии. 2024;141–147. https://mcp.vlsu.ru/index.php?id=archive
8. Крицин А.В., Лихачева С.Ю., Любов Д.М., Тихонов А.В. Анализ методов расчета деревянных изгибаемых элементов, усиленных углеродным волокном. Региональная архитектура и строительство. 2014;4:97–104. URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22831599 (дата обращения: 22.10.2025).
9. Rahimi M, Davoodi MR, Nematzadeh M. A Comparative Study between Beam and Pull-Out Tests on Bond Behavior of Ribbed GFRP Bar in Concrete Conforming to RILEM Standards. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2025;(25)37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-024-01095-1
10. Karelskiy AV, Zhuravleva TP, Labudin BV Load-to-Failure Bending Test of Wood Composite Beams Connected by Gang Nail. Building Materials and Units: Technology and Organization of Construction. 2015;2(54):77–85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.5862/MCE.54.9
11. Klyuev SV, Lobov DM Deformativity of Wooden Beam Structures Strengthened of External Reinforcement of Composite Materials Based on Carbon Fiber. Industrial and Civil Construction 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering. 2022;436. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44432-6_25
12. Kavelin AS, Tyutina AD, Nuriev VE, Koltakova VA Reinforcement of Wooden Structres. Engineering Journal of Don. 2019;8(59):44. (In Russ.) URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n8y2019/6156 (accessed: 22.10.2025)
13. Pyatnitskiy AA, Krutik SA, Zhurenkova MA Possibilities of Using Carbon Fiber Composite Materials in Wooden Structures. Scientific and Technical Volga Region Bulletin. 2013;3:241–245. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.ntvprt.ru/ru/archive-vypuskov (accessed: 22.10.2025)
14. Cagnoni A, D’Antino T, Pisani MA Adhesive Choice for Near-Surface-Mounted Reinforcement of Wooden Beams in Historical Buildings. Materials and Structures. 2025;(58)176. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-025-02700-2
15. Aniza R, Petrissans A, Petrissans М Multifunctional Nanotechnology Application for Wood Properties Enhancement: Adhesive and Coating. Nanomaterials Additives in Bioadhesives for Wood Composites. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-3400-2_6
16. Орлов А.О., Лабудин Б.В., Морозов В.С. Исследование прочности и жесткости коннектора с клеем и нагелем. Вестник Поволжского государственного технологического университета. 2019;4(12):95–101. https://doi.org/10.25686/2542-114X.2019.4.95
17. Sundukov SK Preparation of an Epoxy Glue by Ultrasonic Treatment. Polymer Science, Series D 2024;(17):252–258. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995421224700424
18. Georgiev SV, Mailyan DR, Solovyeva AI A New Method of Strengthening the Compressed Reinforced Concrete Columns Based on the Use of Concrete and Composite Materials. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2022;1(2):4–12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2022-1-2-4-12
19. Georgiev SV, Solovyeva AI, Mailyan DR Change in Relative Deformations in Composite Materials of Centrally Compressed Reinforced Concrete Struts. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2022;1(3):24–34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2022-1-3-24-34
20. Fadeev RN, Lisyatnikov MS Development of the Field of Application of Modified Wood in Combined Glued Wooden Structures. Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Physics of Materials, Building Structures and Technologies in Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (MPCPE-2024). Vladimir: ARKAIM; 2024:230–236. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=69150633 (accessed: 22.10.2025)
21. Khitrov EG, Birman AR, Ugryumov SA. Calculating the Load-Bearing Capacity of Prestressed Wooden Beams. Polymer Science, Series D. 2023;(16):836–839. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995421223040147
22. Muselemov KhM, Ustrakhanov OM, Kalieva MKh, Manapov RM The Research of Glued Frame-Mounted Wooden Constructions. Science in Figures. 2016;1:10–13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21661/r-114936
23. Blokhina NS, Nazarenko SN Computer analysis of spatial operation of beams made of wood reinforced with transverse reinforcement. Innovations and Investments. 2016;10:216–218. (In Russ.)
24. Padilha TM, Meneghetti EM, Reis ED. Assessment of Glued Laminated Timber Beams Reinforced with Steel Bars under Bending at High Temperatures. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering. 2025;(47)611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-025-05901-6
25. Guardigli L Comparing the Environmental Impact of Reinforced Concrete and Wooden Structures. Eco-efficient Construction and Building Materials. 2014;407–433. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097729.3.407
Review
For citations:
Myasnikov D.O., Repin V.A., Roshchina S.I. Adhesive Strength of Wood Glue Joints with a Reinforcement Made from Used Band Saw Blades. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2025;4(4):61-68. https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2025-4-4-61-68. EDN: UBYKLB
JATS XML




















