Preview

Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning

Advanced search

Fundamentals of Ensuring the Environmental Safety of Building Materials at all Stages of their Life Cycle

https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2023-2-2-72-80

Abstract

Introduction. Environmental safety assessment for selecting the optimal technology of building materials manufacture is quite relevant. The necessity of environmental assessment (environmental safety assessment) of each life cycle stage of any building material (from the purchase of raw materials or the manufacture of products out of natural resources to the disposal of products) has been distinguished as a scientific problem for the present research, alongside, the authors have supplemented the schematic diagram of a building material life cycle with the transportation stage (of raw materials, finished products). The object of the study is a notional building material, and the purpose of the study is assessment of the stress imposed on the environment components by each life cycle stage of a notional building material. This work should foster implementation of more environmentally safe technology of building materials manufacture.
Materials and Methods. The authors examined the interrelation between the properties of materials and the quality of the environment using the methods of comparative and system analysis, the graph method and the qualimetric method. Results. As a result of the conducted research, the potential impacts of a notional building material on the environment at all life cycle stages have been analysed — from purchase of raw materials, manufacture and use of products till their processing at the end of service life, recycling and final disposal (the cycle “from cradle to grave”). The authors proposed to take into account the stages of transportation of raw materials and finished products within the building materials life cycle to make a more accurate assessment of their impact on the environment. This approach allows taking into account the entire life cycle and applying the data to solving the environmental problems, such as reducing the amount of emissions, discharges and wastes, thus, fostering saving the resources.
Discussion and Conclusions. The environmental assessment of a building material life cycle, should, first of all, take into account the share of its negative impact in the aggravation of the global environmental problems, including global warming, ozone destruction in the stratospheric layer of the atmosphere, formation of ozone in the tropospheric layer, oxidation of water resources and soils, eutrophication of water bodies, depletion of non-renewable energy sources (oil, gas, coal). The carried out analysis allows the authors to conclude that significant differences in the degree of negative impact of the notional building materials on the environment components are observed at the stage of their manufacture.

About the Authors

E. P. Lysova
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina P Lysova, associate professor of the Environmental Engineering Department, Cand. Sc. (Engineering)

1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003



E. V. Kotlyarova
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation

Ekaterina V Kotlyarova, associate professor of the Environmental Engineering Department, Cand. Sc. (Economics)

1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003



References

1. Bespalov V, Kotlyarova E. Assessment of the level of impact and degree of environmental safety of industrial facilities in the urban environment. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2018;177:012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/177/1/012036

2. Bespalov V, Kotlyarova E. Methodological bases for assessing the level of environmental safety of dynamically developing urbanized territories. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;1001:012101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1001/1/012101

3. Halding PS. Reduction of the Carbon Footprint of Precast Columns by Combining Normal and Light Aggregate Concrete. Buildings. 2022;12(2):215. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020215

4. Colangelo F, Forcina A, Farina I. et al. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Different Kinds of Concrete Containing Waste for Sustainable Construction. Buildings. 2018;8(5):70. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8050070

5. Bovea MD, Powell JC. Developments in life cycle assessment applied to evaluate the environmental performance of construction and demolition wastes. Waste Management. 2016;50:151–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.036

6. Ensign PC. Business Models and Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability. 2022;14:2558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052558

7. Daugaard D, Ding A. Global Drivers for ESG Performance: The Body of Knowledge. Sustainability. 2022;14(4):2322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042322

8. Verstina N, Solopova N, Taskaeva N. et al. New Approach to Assessing the Energy Efficiency of Industrial Facilities. Buildings. 2022;12(2):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020191

9. Reyes-Quijije M, Rocha-Tamayo A, García-Troncoso N. et al. Preparation, Characterization, and Life Cycle Assessment of Aerated Concrete Blocks: A Case Study in Guayaquil City, Ecuador. Applied Science. 2022;12(4):1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041913

10. Pushkar S, Yezioro A. Life Cycle Assessment Meeting Energy Standard Performance: An Office Building Case Study. Buildings. 2022;12(2):157. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020157

11. Ferretti D, Michelini E. The Effect of Density on the Delicate Balance between Structural Requirements and Environmental Issues for AAC Blocks: An Experimental Investigation. Sustainability. 2021;13(23):13186. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313186

12. Yang Q, Kong L, Tong H. et al. Evaluation Model of Environmental Impacts of Insulation Building Envelopes. Sustainability. 2020;12(6):2258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062258

13. Chen P-K, Lujan-Blanco I, Fortuny-Santos J. et al. Manufacturing and Environmental Sustainability: The Effects of Employee Involvement, Stakeholder Pressure and ISO 14001. Sustainability. 2020;12(18):7258. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187258

14. Ociepa-Kubicka A, Deska I, Ociepa E. Organizations towards the Evaluation of Environmental Management Tools ISO 14001 and EMAS. Energies. 2021;14(16):4870. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164870

15. Kisku N, Joshi H, Ansari M. et al. A critical review and assessment for usage of recycled aggregate as sustainable construction material. Construction and Building Materials. 2017;131:721–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.029

16. Knyazeva VP. Ekologicheskie aspekty vybora materialov v arhitekturnom proektirovanii. Moscow: ArhitekturaS Publ.; 2006. 296 p. Available at: http://books.totalarch.com/ecological_aspects_of_the_choice_of_materials_in_architectural


Review

For citations:


Lysova E.P., Kotlyarova E.V. Fundamentals of Ensuring the Environmental Safety of Building Materials at all Stages of their Life Cycle. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2023;2(2):72-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2023-2-2-72-80

Views: 361


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-1835 (Online)