Determining the Stabilised Subfoudation Soil Deformation Modulus According to the Plate Load Tests and Geotechnical Monitoring Data
https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2023-2-3-17-30
Abstract
Introduction. The subsiding soils, which are widely spread in the south of Russia, create a number of problems and hazards due to the high probability of subfoundations subsidence in case of exceeding the values of initial soil moisture and initial pressure for subsidence. This is an important phenomenon to be considered at all life cycle stages of a building or structure, especially at the stage of design, when the scientifically justified design and technological solutions must be developed to ensure the reliable operation of facilities in the complicated engineering and geological conditions being studied hereby. The present article analyses the acting federal and regional regulatory and technical documentation in the field of buildings and structures design on the subsiding soils. Based on the numerical experiment, the incorrectness of the results sometimes received upon following the normative methodology is shown. A new calculating methodology based on determining the stabilised subfoudation soil deformation modulus according to the plate load tests and geotechnical monitoring data is proposed.
Materials and Methods. The research comprised:
– analysis of the existing approaches and methodologies for the subfoundations and foundations design on the subsiding soils;
– numerical experiments, including calculations according to the normative methodology, which implied variation of the original data of both the initial properties of soils and technological parameters of stabilisation, as well as statistical processing of the results;
– analysis of the carried out earlier by the authors geotechnical monitoring results of the buildings built on the stabilized soils and experimental study of the deformation properties using a patented device;
– determining the main factors having influence on the design solutions for the subfoudation soils and building foundations strengthening under a complicated set of operational loads and establishing a new dependence of the stabilised soil deformation modulus on the initial soil deformation modulus and percentage of soil reinforcement.
Research results. It has been established that the existing methodologies for calculating the stabilised subfoudation soils are not enough precise for determining the forecastable subsidence of buildings and structures, and the obtained design values do not always correspond to the factual deformations of subfoundations and foundations. The dependence of the stabilised subfoudation soil deformation modulus on the initial soil deformation modulus and percentage of soil reinforcement with the cement-sand mortar has been traced. A new calculating methodology has been developed based on determining the stabilised subgrade soil deformation modulus according to the data of the plate load tests using a patented device and geotechnical monitoring.
Discussion and conclusion. It has been established that the deformation modulus of the soil mass stabilised by the cementation method depends non-linearly on percentage of soil reinforcement with the cement-sand mortar and the initial soil deformation modulus, and this dependence is described by a second-order surface equation of a general form. It is recommended to apply the discovered dependencies for designing the technological parameters of the subsiding soils stabilisation in the Rostov region conditions.
About the Authors
A. Yu. ProkopovRussian Federation
Albert Yu. Prokopov, Dr.Sci.(Engineering), Professor, Head of the Engineering Geology, Bases and Foundations Department
1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003
I. V. Sychev
Russian Federation
Ilya V. Sychev, Senior Lecturer of the Engineering Geology, Bases and Foundations Department
1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003
A. V. Ryazantseva
Russian Federation
Anastasiya V. Ryazantseva, Master Student of the Engineering Geology, Bases and Foundations Department
1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003
References
1. Osipov VI, Anikeev AV, Burova VN, Kozlyakova IV, Postoev GP, Eremina ON, et al. Geologicheskii risk urban- izirovannykh territorii. Monograph. Moscow: RUDN University Publ.; 2020. 312 p. (In Russ.).
2. Osipov VI, Karpenko FS, Rumyantseva NA. Active Porosity and its Influence on Physico-Mechanical Properties of Clay. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya Geologiya. Gidrogeologiya. Geokriologiya. 2014;(3):262–269. (In Russ.). URL: https://nau-karus.com/aktivnaya-poristost-i-ee-vliyanie-na-fiziko-mehanicheskie-svoystva-glinistyh-gruntov (accessed: 12.06.2023).
3. Osipov VI. Density of clay minerals. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. 2012;48(6):231–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-012-9153-0
4. Trofimov VT. The Experience of Bored Ground Piles System Creation as an Effective Method of Deep Strengthening of Subsidence Loess Soils Massif. Engineering Geology World. 2018;13(4–5):120–122. (In Russ.).
5. Anan'ev VP. Lessovye porody i inzhenernaya geologiya. Izvestiya Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo stroitel'nogo universiteta. 2011;(15):36-40. (In Russ.)
6. Anan'ev VP, Potapov AD, Fil'kin NA. Special Engineering Geology. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ.; 2016. 263 p. (In Russ.).
7. Mangushev RA, Osokin AI, Usmanov RA. Ustroistvo i Rekonstruktsiya Osnovanii i Fundamentov na Slabykh i Strukturno-Neustoichivykh Gruntakh. Monograph. Saint Petersburg: Lan' Publ.; 2021. 460 p. (In Russ.). URL: https://reader.lanbook.com/book/171863?demoKey=167bac60ad16c29a83a26c6b02ef6ff5#2 (accessed: 12.06.2023).
8. Galai BF, Serbin VV, Galai OB. Collapsing Soil Compaction Experience in North Caucasus. Geotechnics. 2018;10(5–6):42–50. URL: https://www.geomark.ru/articles/opyt-uplotneniya-prosadochnykh-gruntov (In Russ.).
9. Cherkasov SM. Calculation of the Amount of Deformation of Loess Subsiding Soils under Own Weight and Its Comparison With Experimental Work Results. Nauchnoe obozrenie. 2014;11(3):746–749. (In Russ.).
10. Dolzhikov P, Prokopov A, Akopyan V. Foundation Deformations Modeling in Underworking and Hydroactivated Rocks. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Energy Management of Municipal Transportation Facilities and Transport EMMFT 2017. Series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Cham: Springer Publ.; 2018. P. 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70987-1_69
11. Akopyan V, Akopyan A. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of the Interaction of the Reinforced Concrete Screw Piles with the Surrounding Soil. In: 2nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE-2016). Series: Procedia Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publ.; 2016. 150. P. 2202–2207.
12. Zhur VN, Aleksandrov AP, Kulikov AS. Analysis of Subsidence Processes During Compression Compression of Clay Soils in the Rostov Region and the Republic of Kalmykia. Engineering Journal of Don. 2021;73(1):260-270. (In Russ.). URL: http://ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n1y2021/6801 (accessed:12.06.2023).
13. Prokopova MV, Prokopov AYu, Zhur VN. Usilenie prosadochnykh gruntov pod sushchestvuyushchei zastroi-koi g. Rostova-na-Donu. Trudy Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putei soobshcheniya. 2016;(4):79–87. (In Russ.).
14. Prokopova MV, Prokopov AYu, Zhur VN. Investigation of the Properties of Less Surface Grounds of the Eastern Donbass. In: Proceedings of the International Science and Practical Conference “Transport: Science, Education, Production”. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State Transport University; 2017. P. 354–358. (In Russ.).
15. Prokopov A, Zhur V, Medvedev A. Application of the Cartographic Method of Research for the Detection of the Dangerous Zones of Mining Industrial Territories. In: Proceedings of the 27th Russian-Polish-Slovak Seminar, Theoretical Foundation of Civil Engineering. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018;196:03009. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819603009
16. Girya LV, Belash VV, Khorenkov SV, Petrov KS. Quality Control of the Production Work on the Consolidation of Soil Foundation Using the GPR Subsurface Sensing. Engineering Journal of Don. 2013;27(4). (In Russ.). URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n4y2013/2056 (accessed: 12.06.2023).
17. Gaponov DA, Fomenko LN, Sheremet RD. The Use of Georadar in Quality Control of Soil Stabilization. (In Russ.). URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/n3y2016/3724 Engineering Journal of Don. 2016;42(3). (accessed: 12.06.2023).
18. Prokopov A, Prokopova M, Rubtsova Ya. The Experience of Strengthening Subsidence of the Soil under the Existing Building in the City of Rostov-on-Don. In: Proceedings of the International Science Conference “Smart City” (SPBWOSCE 2016). MATEC Web of Conferences. St. Petersburg: EDP Sciences Publ.; 2017. P. 02001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710602001
19. Prokopov A.Yu, Sychev IV. Determination of the Deformation Characteristics of the Soil Massif, Transformed According to the Technology of Soil Reinforcement with Cement-sand Mortar. Engineering Journal of Don. 2019;54(3). (In Russ.). URL: http://www.ivdon.ru/ru/magazine/archive/N3y2019/5809 (accessed: 12.06.2023).
Review
For citations:
Prokopov A.Yu., Sychev I.V., Ryazantseva A.V. Determining the Stabilised Subfoudation Soil Deformation Modulus According to the Plate Load Tests and Geotechnical Monitoring Data. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2023;2(3):17-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2023-2-3-17-30