Preview

Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning

Advanced search

Organisational and Technological Solutions for Construction of the Quick-Assembly Buildings

https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2024-3-4-87-95

EDN: OWQKWJ

Abstract

Introduction. A financial component of the project result affects considerably the implementation of the new technologies and is, among other things, a fundamental factor in assessing project’s efficiency. In most cases, when developing a project for the production of works, the project designers do not take into account the specific regional features, for example, when building the housing and welfare facilities for the needs of gas industry, they do not use an integrated approach, therefore, the final costs do not match the initially planned ones.

Materials and Methods. The article studies the main factors affecting the cost of a project, the influence of logistics on the project cost reduction and the most significant logistic problems to be solved. The typical risks and planning mistakes in the development of a project for the production of works have been investigated.

Results. A comparative analysis of the main costs required for the successful development of a project, the project logistical tasks, the standard and proposed calendar plan of the production of works based on the common decision-making was made. The main indicators having the foremost impact on the final cost of construction of a facility were identified. The main steps of calculation fostering the optimisation of target cost accounting were formulated.

Discussion and Conclusion. Net income was determined to be the main indicator of project management efficiency, i.e. obtaining positive result of company’s financial and construction activity. The balance of all incoming funds and required expenses was compiled: expenses and payments, including the ones allocated to the construction of a facility, as well as taxes per certain moment of facility construction. In the context of full life cycle of an object of construction, an assumption was made about inefficiency of panel buildings compared to the quick-assembly modular buildings due to the issues of transportation, erecting, subsequent operation and, eventually, after construction dismantling of the former. The most simplified solutions were proposed.

About the Authors

N. V. Rozantseva
St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Russian Federation

Nadezhda V. Rozantseva, Cand.Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor of the Organisation of Construction Department

authorId=57205443634

4, 2-nd Krasnoarmeyskaya Str., Saint Petersburg, 190005



A. S. Dimitriev
St. Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering
Russian Federation

Alexander S. Dimitriev, Master's Student of the Organisation of Construction Department

4, 2-nd Krasnoarmeyskaya Str., Saint Petersburg, 190005



References

1. Khamzina IA, Petrunina ZhV. Life of Komsomolsk-on-Amur in the 1930s. (To the Question of Far Eastern Historiography). Uchenye zapiski Komsomol'skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (Scientific Notes of Komsomolsk-on-Amur State Technical University). 2020;1(41):88–93. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42826671 (accessed: 07.08.2024).

2. Khayrullin VA, Kuznetsov DV, Gareeva ZA. The Theoretical Substantiation Of Quasimoney Flow in the Assessment of Social Effect. Naukovedenie (Science Studies). 2015;7(4(29)):55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15862/98EVN415

3. Badin GM, Sychev SA. Scientific and Technological Basis of High-Speed Energy-Efficient Construction Systems in the Far North. Collection of Scientific Papers of RAACS. 2020;2:20–31. (In Russ.)

4. Afanasyev AV, Afanasyev VA. Organisation of Construction of Quick-Assembly Buildings and Structures. QuickAssembly and Mobile Buildings and Structures: Prospects of Use in Modern Conditions. Saint Petersburg: Stroiizdat; 1998. P. 226–230. (In Russ.)

5. Solovieva EV, Pakhomov IA. Technology Frame-Monolithic Construction of Energy-Efficient Low-Rise Buildings with Intermediate Insulation (Polystyrene Foam Core). Science. Engineering. Technology. 2015;(1):77–82. (In Russ.) URL: https://id-yug.com/index.php/ru/ntt/archiv/2015/1-2015?id=307 (accessed: 07.08.2024).

6. Erofeev PYu, Kalyuzhnik MM, Seko EV. Study of the Market of Block-Modular Construction of Quick-Assembly Buildings and Settlements. In book: Thematic Collection of Papers. V. A. Zarenkov (Ed.), Dr.Sci (Economics), Professor. Saint Petersburg: Stroiizdat SPB; 2003. P. 105–112. (In Russ.)

7. Golikova YuA, Wang Yu. Features of Economic Analysis, Risks and Assessment of Project Efficiency. In: Proceedings of the IV International Scientific Conference “Topical Problems of Management, Economics and Economic Security”. Cheboksary: Chelyabinsk State University; 2022. P. 77–80. (In Russ.) URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49808331 (accessed: 07.11.2024).

8. Kosyanov SO. Innovative Technologies in Construction. Fiber Reinforced Cement Board— A Universal and Modern Finishing Material. Kompleksnye problemy razvitiya nauki, obrazovaniya i ehkonomiki regiona (Complex Problems of Development of Science, Education and Economy of the Region). 2012;2:39–42. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Rozantseva N.V., Dimitriev A.S. Organisational and Technological Solutions for Construction of the Quick-Assembly Buildings. Modern Trends in Construction, Urban and Territorial Planning. 2024;3(4):87-95. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2949-1835-2024-3-4-87-95. EDN: OWQKWJ

Views: 108


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2949-1835 (Online)